Tempei Otsubo
   Department   School of Medicine(Tokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center), School of Medicine
   Position   Professor
Article types Original article
Language English
Peer review Peer reviewed
Presence of invitation Invited paper
Title Feasibility of remote interviews in assessing disease severity in patients with major depressive disorder: A pilot study.
Journal Formal name:Neuropsychopharmacology reports
Abbreviation:Neuropsychopharmacol Rep
ISSN code:2574173X/2574173X
Domestic / ForeginForegin
Volume, Issue, Page 44(1),pp.149-157
Author and coauthor Sumiyoshi Tomiki, Morio Yasunori, Kawashima Takahiro, Tachimori Hisateru, Hongo Seiji, Kishimoto Taishiro, Watanabe Koichiro, Otsubo Tempei, Oi Hideki, Nakagome Kazuyuki, Ishigooka Jun
Publication date 2024/03
Summary AIM:Interview quality is an important factor in the success of clinical trials for major depressive disorder (MDD). There is a substantial need to establish a reliable, remote clinical assessment interview system that can replace traditional in-person interviews.METHODS:We conducted a multicenter, randomized, unblinded, prospective, cross-sectional study to assess the reliability of remote interviews in patients with MDD (UMIN000041839). Eligible patients with MDD underwent remote and in-person sessions of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) assessment performed by different raters within 28 days of providing consent. Patients were randomized to a group first assessed using in-person interviews and secondarily using remote interviews (in-person-first group) or a group first assessed by remote interviews and secondarily using in-person interviews (remote-first group). Nineteen trained people (15 clinical psychologists, 3 nurses, and 1 clinical laboratory technologist) performed interviews.RESULTS:Of 59 patients (in-person-first group, n = 32; remote-first group, n = 27) who completed both remote and in-person interviews, 51% (n = 30) were women; the mean age was 41.6 years (range, 21-64 years). There was a strong association between remote and in-person MADRS scores (r = 0.891, kappa = 0.901). An overall intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.886 (95% confidence interval, 0.877-0.952) indicated good consistency between MADRS scores in remote and in-person interviews. The ICC decreased as the severity of depression increased.CONCLUSION:Our results suggest remote interviews are a feasible alternative option to in-person interviews in assessing symptom severity in MDD patients and could promote clinical trials in Japan.
DOI 10.1002/npr2.12411
PMID 38267023