ヤマグチ シゲキ   YAMAGUCHI SHIGEKI
  山口 茂樹
   所属   医学部 医学科(東京女子医科大学病院)
   職種   教授・基幹分野長
論文種別 原著
言語種別 英語
査読の有無 査読なし
表題 Linear stapler anastomosis for esophagogastrostomy in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy reduce reflux esophagitis.
掲載誌名 正式名:Langenbeck's archives of surgery
略  称:Langenbecks Arch Surg
ISSNコード:14352451/14352443
掲載区分国外
巻・号・頁 406(8),pp.2709-2716
著者・共著者 Sugita Hirofumi, Sakuramoto Shinichi, Oya Shuichiro, Fujiwara Naoto, Miyawaki Yutaka, Satoh Hiroshi, Okamoto Kojun, Yamaguchi Shigeki, Koyama Isamu
発行年月 2021/12
概要 PURPOSE:There are various reconstruction methods for Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG), such as esophagogastrostomy (EG), double-tract reconstruction, and jejunal interposition. We have performed EG using a circular stapler (OrVil) from 2013 and using a linear stapler from 2017. The aim of this retrospective study was to clarify which stapler is better for EG for LPG.METHODS:The data of 84 patients who underwent EG for LPG between January 2013 and September 2019 were analyzed. EG with fundoplication was done using a circular stapler (OrVil) in 45 patients (CS group) and a linear stapler in 39 patients (LS group). The patients' medical records were reviewed. Clinical symptoms were obtained by interview at each outpatient consultation. All patients underwent postoperative 1-year follow-up endoscopy. To minimize bias between the two groups, propensity scores were calculated using a logistic regression model. After propensity-score matching, 60 patients (30 in the CS group and 30 in the LS group) were studied.RESULTS:Patient characteristics, operative outcomes were similar in two groups. Anastomotic leakage occurred in one patient (3.3%) in both groups. Anastomotic stenosis occurred in five patients (16.7%) in the CS group and two patients (6.7%) in the LS group. The rate of patients with severe reflux esophagitis (grade C or D) was significantly lower in the LS group (3.4%) than in the CS group (26.7%) (p = 0.026).CONCLUSIONS:EG with a linear stapler could reduce the risk of severe reflux esophagitis, and it could be a safe and feasible anastomosis for patients after LPG.
DOI 10.1007/s00423-021-02250-5
PMID 34155545