熊切　順
   Department   School of Medicine(Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital), School of Medicine
   Position   Professor
Article types Original article
Language English
Peer review Peer reviewed
Title Potential risk of port-site adhesions in patients after laparoscopic myomectomy using radially expanding trocars.
Journal Formal name：International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
Abbreviation：Int J Gynaecol Obstet
ISSN code：18793479/00207292
Domestic / ForeginForegin
Volume, Issue, Page 128(1),pp.5-9
Author and coauthor Kumakiri Jun†*, Kikuchi Iwaho, Kitade Mari, Jinushi Makoto, Shinjyo Azusa, Takeda Satoru
Authorship Lead author,Corresponding author
Publication date 2015/01
Summary OBJECTIVE:To investigate the incidence of port-site adhesions following use of radially expanding trocars (RETs) at laparoscopic myomectomy by observation via second-look laparoscopy (SLL).METHODS:In a retrospective study, data from patients who underwent SLL after laparoscopic myomectomy between January 2007 and June 2012 at Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, were assessed for the incidence of port-site adhesions forming below RET incisional scars when fascial and peritoneal defects had not been closed.RESULTS:During the study period, 554 patients underwent SLL, and 2176 incisional scars were examined. Adhesions were detected in 15 patients (2.8%); thus, the incidence of port-site adhesions under scars was 0.7% (15/2176). Among these 15 patients, the wounds with adhesions were located as follows: 6 (1.1%) under the umbilical scar, 5 (0.9%) under the right lower abdominal scar, 2 (0.4%) under the left upper abdominal scar, and 2 (0.4%) under the left lower abdominal scar. According to multiple regression analysis, the duration of laparoscopic myomectomy was positively associated with port-site adhesions (odds ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.94; P=0.02).CONCLUSION:The present data suggest that the incidence of port-site hernias and adhesions under RET incisional scars is low despite the non-closure of fascial and peritoneal defects.
DOI 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.07.030
PMID 25282402