HIGUCHI Ryota    Department   School of Medicine(Yachiyo Medical Center), School of Medicine    Position   Assistant Professor
Article types	Original article
Language	English
Peer review	Non peer reviewed
Title	International Expert Consensus on Precision Anatomy for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: PAM-HBP Surgery Project.
Journal	Formal name：Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences Abbreviation：J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci ISSN code：18686982/18686974
Domestic / Foregin	Foregin
Volume, Issue, Page	29(1),pp.161-173
Author and coauthor	Ban Daisuke, Nishino Hitoe, Ohtsuka Takao, Nagakawa Yuichi, Abu Hilal Mohammed, Asbun Horacio J, Boggi Ugo, Goh Brian K P, He Jin, Honda Goro, Jang Jin-Young, Kang Chang Moo, Kendrick Michael L, Kooby David A, Liu Rong, Nakamura Yoshiharu, Nakata Kohei, Palanivelu Chinnusamy, Shrikhande Shailesh V, Takaori Kyoichi, Tang Chung-Ngai, Wang Shin-E, Wolfgang Christopher L, Yiengpruksawan Anusak, Yoon Yoo-Seok, Ciria Ruben, Berardi Giammauro, Garbarino Giovanni Maria, Higuchi Ryota, Ikenaga Naoki, Ishikawa Yoshiya, Kozono Shingo, Maekawa Aya, Murase Yoshiki, Watanabe Yusuke, Zimmitti Giuseppe, Kunzler Filipe, Wang Zi-Zheng, Sakuma Leon, Osakabe Hiroaki, Takishita Chie, Endo Itaru, Tanaka Masao, Yamaue Hiroki, Tanabe Minoru, Wakabayashi Go, Tsuchida Akihiko, Nakamura Masafumi
Publication date	2022/01
Summary	BACKGROUND:Surgical views with high resolution and magnification have enabled us to recognize the precise anatomical structures that can be used as landmarks during minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP). This study aimed to validate the usefulness of anatomy-based approaches for MIDP before and during the Expert Consensus Meeting: Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery (February 24, 2021).METHODS:Twenty-five international MIDP experts developed clinical questions regarding surgical anatomy and approaches for MIDP. Studies identified via a comprehensive literature search were classified using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. Online Delphi voting was conducted after experts had drafted the recommendations, with the goal of obtaining >75% consensus. Experts discussed the revised recommendations in front of the validation committee and an international audience of 384 attendees. Finalized recommendations were made after a second round of online Delphi voting.RESULTS:Four clinical questions were addressed, resulting in 10 recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a 75% consensus among experts.CONCLUSIONS:The expert consensus on precision anatomy for MIDP has been presented as a set of recommendations based on available evidence and expert opinions. These recommendations should guide experts and trainees in performing safe MIDP and foster its appropriate dissemination worldwide.
DOI	10.1002/jhbp.1071
PMID	34719123