MASAMUNE Ken
   Department   Research Institutes and Facilities, Research Institutes and Facilities
   Position   Professor
Article types Original article
Language English
Peer review Peer reviewed
Title Construction of brain area risk map for decision making using surgical navigation and motor evoked potential monitoring information.
Journal Formal name:International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery
Abbreviation:Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg
ISSN code:18616429/18616410
Domestic / ForeginForegin
Volume, Issue, Page 18(2),pp.269-278
Author and coauthor YAMAGUCHI Tomoko†, KUWANO Atsushi, KOYAMA Toshihiko, OKAMOTO Jun, SUZUKI Shigeyuki, OKUDA Hideki, SAITO Taiichi, MASAMUNE Ken, MURAGAKI Yoshihiro
Publication date 2022/09/23
Summary PURPOSE:Surgical devices or systems typically operate in a stand-alone manner, making it difficult to perform integration analysis of both intraoperative anatomical and functional information. To address this issue, the intraoperative information integration system OPeLiNK® was developed. The objective of this study is to generate information for decision making using surgical navigation and intraoperative monitoring information accumulated in the OPeLiNK® database and to analyze its utility.METHODS:We accumulated intraoperative information from 27 brain tumor patients who underwent resection surgery. First, the risk rank for postoperative paralysis was set according to the attenuation rate and amplitude width of the motor evoked potential (MEP). Then, the MEP and navigation log data were combined and plotted on an intraoperative magnetic resonance image of the individual brain. Finally, statistical parametric mapping (SPM) transformation was performed to generate a standard brain risk map of postoperative paralysis. Additionally, we determined the anatomical high-risk areas using atlases and analyzed the relationship with each set risk rank.RESULTS:The average distance between the navigation log corresponding to each MEP risk rank and the anatomical high-risk area differed significantly between the with postoperatively paralyzed and without postoperatively paralyzed groups, except for "safe." Furthermore, no excessive deformation was observed resulting from SPM conversion to create the standard brain risk map. There were cases in which no postoperative paralysis occurred even when MEP decreased intraoperatively, and vice versa.CONCLUSION:The time synchronization reliability of the study data is very high. Therefore, our created risk map can be reported as being functional at indicating the risk areas. Our results suggest that the statistical risks of postoperative complications can be presented for each area where brain surgery is to be performed. In the future, it
DOI 10.1007/s11548-022-02752-7
PMID 36151348