ナカバヤシ　アキラ   Nakabayashi Akira   中林　章    所属   医学部 医学科（東京女子医科大学病院）    職種   准教授
論文種別	原著
言語種別	英語
査読の有無	査読あり
表題	Comparison of a Reduced Needle With a Thin Tip and a Standard Thin Needle (Same Width Overall) for Oocyte Retrieval.
掲載誌名	正式名：Cureus 略　 称：Cureus ISSNコード：21688184/21688184
掲載区分	国外
巻・号・頁	16(6),pp.e62787
著者・共著者	Nakabayashi Akira, Hashimoto Yuriko, Horibe Yu, Hashimoto Tomomi, Murata Shuko, Kakogawa Jun
発行年月	2024/06
概要	INTRODUCTION:At our facility, oocyte retrieval had previously been performed with a 20-gauge standard needle that is uniformly thin overall (tSN); but recently, we have instead started using reduced needles, with a 20-gauge tip and 17-gauge body (RN). Until now, there have been comparisons between RN and thick standard needles, but there have been no comparisons between RN and tSN. The purpose of this study was to compare oocyte retrieval outcomes using RN with tSN.METHODOLOGY: Information on oocyte retrieval was extracted from the medical records of 304 cycles performed at our facility from January 2020 to December 2023. The oocyte retrieval outcomes of the two types of needles were compared retrospectively with respect to age, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), procedure time, additional sedatives, number of follicles punctured, number of oocytes retrieved, number of oocytes fertilized, oocyte recovery rate, and fertilization rate.RESULTS:When AMH ≥ 1.2 ng/mL, the procedure time was 9.3 ± 3.7 and 12.1 ± 4.6 minutes in the RN and tSN groups, respectively (P < 0.001), and the need for additional sedatives was also significantly different: 54.0% in the RN group and 78.5% in the tSN group (P = 0.002). The oocyte recovery rate was significantly different between the RN and tSN groups at 65.3% and 61.2%, respectively (P = 0.046), and the fertilization rate was significantly different between the RN and tSN groups at 56.8% and 66.8%, respectively (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences by age, AMH, number of follicles punctured, number of oocytes retrieved, or number of oocytes fertilized.CONCLUSIONS:Without diminished ovarian reserve, RN reduced procedure time and the need for additional sedatives compared to tSN. In addition, the number of oocytes fertilized per oocyte retrieval remained the same, indicating that oocyte retrieval performance was not affected.
DOI	10.7759/cureus.62787
PMID	39036140