シンカワ タケシ   Shinkawa Takeshi
  新川 武史
   所属   医学部 医学科(東京女子医科大学病院)
   職種   教授
論文種別 原著
言語種別 英語
査読の有無 査読なし
表題 Tricuspid valve replacement provides better long-term survival and tricuspid valve function than repair in patients with systemic right ventricle.
掲載誌名 正式名:JTCVS open
略  称:JTCVS Open
ISSNコード:26662736/26662736
掲載区分国外
巻・号・頁 15,pp.382-393
著者・共著者 Furuta Akihisa†, Shinkawa Takeshi, Okugi Satoshi, Yoshida Hisashi, Niinami Hiroshi
発行年月 2023/09
概要 OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study is to compare the long-term outcomes of 2 different tricuspid surgeries including valvuloplasty and replacement for significant tricuspid regurgitation in patients with systemic right ventricle.METHOD:This is a retrospective study of 34 patients with dextro-transposition of the great arteries or levo-transposition of the great arteries with biventricular circulation and systemic right ventricle undergoing tricuspid valve surgery between April 1979 and April 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the procedure: tricuspid valvuloplasty (n = 11) and tricuspid valve replacement (n = 23). These groups were compared in terms of survival, tricuspid valve dysfunction, and tricuspid valve-related reoperation.RESULTS:There was no significant difference between the groups in operative age, body weight, the proportion of dextro-transposition of the great arteries, Ebstein-like tricuspid dysplasia, and preoperative right ventricular volume/function. During the median follow-up of 9.7 years, there was 1 early death (tricuspid valvuloplasty group) and 4 late deaths (3 in tricuspid valvuloplasty group and 1 in tricuspid valve replacement group). There were 7 tricuspid valve dysfunctions, including 6 significant tricuspid regurgitations in the tricuspid valvuloplasty group and 1 prosthetic valve dysfunction in the tricuspid valve replacement group, and 4 tricuspid valve-related reoperations (3 in the tricuspid valvuloplasty group and 1 in the tricuspid valve replacement group) were performed. There were significant differences between the groups in survival (tricuspid valvuloplasty vs tricuspid valve replacement: 72.7 vs 94.7% at 10 years after surgery, P = .0328) and cumulative incidence of tricuspid valve dysfunction at 10 years after tricuspid surgery (tricuspid valvuloplasty vs tricuspid valve replacement: 27.3% vs 0%, P = .0121).CONCLUSIONS:Tricuspid valve replacement provided better long-term survival and tricuspid function in pa
DOI 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.06.013
PMID 37808018