ヤマグチ シゲキ   Yamaguchi Shigeki
  山口 茂樹
   所属   医学部 医学科(東京女子医科大学病院)
   職種   教授・基幹分野長
論文種別 原著
言語種別 英語
査読の有無 査読なし
表題 Safety, efficacy, and operability of a newly developed absorbable adhesion barrier (GM142) in patients with primary rectal cancer scheduled for diverting ileostomy during laparoscopic surgery: Randomized controlled trial.
掲載誌名 正式名:Annals of gastroenterological surgery
略  称:Ann Gastroenterol Surg
ISSNコード:24750328/24750328
掲載区分国内
巻・号・頁 6(4),pp.515-522
著者・共著者 WATANABE Jun, YAMAGUCHI Shigeki, TAKEMASA Ichiro, YASU Masayoshi, HIRANO Yasumitsu, NAKANO Daisuke, SHIOMI Akio, MUNAKATA Shinya, NAITO Masanori, TSUKAMOTO Shunsuke, ISHIBE Atsushi, KURIU Yoshiaki, UCHIMA Yasutake, MORI Shinichiro, KANAZAWA Hideki, WAKABAYASHI Go, YAMADA Takeshi, EZU Muneaki, WATANABE Masahiko, KINUGASA Yusuke
担当区分 2nd著者
発行年月 2022/07
概要 AIM:The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of GM142, a newly developed gelatin film with a concave and convex structure to a commercially available conventional film, hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose.METHODS:Patients with primary rectal cancer who were scheduled for diverting ileostomy during laparoscopic surgery were eligible for this study. Patients were randomized before surgery and an antiadhesion film was applied under the umbilical incision. The primary outcome was the incidence of adhesion under the midline incision confirmed by second-look surgery for diverting ileostomy closure. The secondary outcomes were the adhesion severity score, the extent of adhesion score, the presence of intestinal obstruction, and the success of all patching.RESULTS:A total of 146 patients were enrolled. A total of 123 patients were included in the full analysis set. The primary outcome of "no adhesion" was observed in 66.1% in the GM142 group and 55.7% in the conventional film group. The noninferiority of GM142 to conventional film was confirmed (P = .0005). The secondary outcomes were similar between the groups. For the safety evaluation, there were no safety concerns regarding allergic reactions to gelatin or increased gelatin-specific IgE antibody titers.CONCLUSIONS:The noninferiority of GM142 to conventional film was shown. GM142 showed no major safety issues. The clinical safety profiles of GM142 suggested certain physiological benefits of the gelatin film as an adhesion barrier.
DOI 10.1002/ags3.12544
PMID 35847436